Whenever a scientist is working with a source of ionizing radiation, a dosimeter is used to keep track of the dose that individual receives. Badges issued provide an estimated 'whole-body' reading and are placed outside of any apron or coat for useful modeling of the cranium. Noble gas monitoring networks are also very useful for detecting harmful radionuclides.
What's most impressive to me is the order of collaboration required to take care of ~100 international nuclear monitoring stations. Some of these are seismic stations for explosions while others contain radioxenon testing equipment. With the advent of antineutrino mapping, global oversight and ownership are made easier and more prevalent.
Most care is taken to ensure that water supplies aren't tarnished with nasty nuclear process byproducts. Compliance measures are swift and abundant. This is also the case for medical physics, wherein smaller and smaller amounts of radiation are being used to treat patients as time goes on. Regulation of materials and treatments is also important.
References
http://www.ctbto.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/ISS_Publication/Radionuclide_23-28.pdf
http://www.gvsu.edu/radsafety/personal-monitoring-7.htm

Are these nuclear monitoring stations multi-purpose? Or is it just a bunch of guys sitting around waiting for someone to set off a nuke?
ReplyDeleteAre the majority of those monitoring stations in the U.S? or U.S controlled? What is that map showing?
ReplyDeleteThanks for the post! Are the low beta emitters (3H, 14C, etc) the radionuclides which are deemed "special"? Why have these nuclides not been studied as extensively?
ReplyDeleteThis was a cool post! Radiation monitoring is something that can be very valuable to us. It also helps us to continue with research to help continue to lower radiation doses to people, including in a medical setting.
ReplyDelete